TELAAH TEORI: MEMAHAMI RELIABILITAS TES PADA PEMBELAJARAN

Authors

  • Yunisa STAIN Mandailing Natal
  • Ilda Pulungan STAIN Mandailing Natal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26858/ges.v8i1.5177

Abstract

Evaluation is a crucial instrument in the Independent Curriculum instructional cycle for measuring the achievement of learning objectives and providing pedagogical feedback. However, in practice, the provision of valid and consistent evaluation tools still faces challenges, characterized by fluctuations in test scores due to weak control over measurement error. This article aims to examine in depth the basic concept of reliability, visualize its operation, and reconstruct techniques for estimating test instrument reliability coefficients. The research method used is library research, analyzing classic and contemporary literature in the fields of educational evaluation and psychometrics using a descriptive-qualitative approach. The results of the discussion indicate that reliability reflects the level of consistency, dependability, and stability of measurement results, which can be estimated using three main approaches: stability (test-retest), equivalence (parallel forms), and internal consistency (such as Split-Half, KR-20/21, and Cronbach's Alpha). A simulation of the Spearman-Brown (Split-Half) formula calculation on a multiple-choice test yielded a reliability coefficient of 0.79. Based on Guilford's criteria, this value is considered high and exceeds the minimum threshold for learning evaluation instruments (0.70), making the instrument highly reliable

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Azwar, S. (2019). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi 4). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Mason: Cengage Learning.

Dwipayani. (2022). Analisis Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal Ulangan Akhir Semester Bidang Studi Bahasa Indonesia Kelas X.D Sma N 1 Terhadap Pencapaian Kompetensi.Oleh. Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 18.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.

Khumaedi, M. (2012). Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, 12(1), 25-30.

Matondang, Z. (2007). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa, 4(1), 87-97.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Ramadhan, M. F., Siroj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Validitas and Reliabilitas. Journal on Education, 6(2), 10967-10975.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Prasyarat Evaluasi: Validitas, Reliabilitas, dan Karakteristik Butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Saputri dkk. (2023). Analisis Instrumen Assesmen : Validitas, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesukaran Dan Daya Beda Butir Soal. Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP, 09, 2986–2995.

Purwanto. (2016). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Siregar, S. (2013). Statistik Parametrik untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sudijono, A. (2018). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumardi. (2020). Teknik Pengukuran dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.

Suryabrata, S. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17-23.

Yati afiyanti. (2002). Validitas dan reliabilitas dalam penelitian kualitatif. Keperawatan Indonesia, 12, 137–141.

Yen, W. M. & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

Published

2026-05-09

Issue

Section

Articles